在My Ideas页面:

当我点击查看更多想法按钮时，状态过滤器应该被尊重。目前，这个链接只是把我带到一个页面，列出了我所有的想法。< / P >

In other words, I want to see a list of all of my ideas with a certain status. But currently, it seems like I can only see the first 6 ideas for that particular status.

我在一所重点大学从事地理信息系统咨询和地理空间教育工作。在这两种情况下，虽然有些不同的场景，但如果能够打印(或保存为jpeg和/或pdf格式)任何和所有地理处理消息和历史将是一件很好的事情。在这样做的过程中，运行1个或多个地理处理工具的地理空间从业者(无论是咨询师还是学生)可以向客户(或教授)提供一份(某种类型的)报告，表明整个处理结果。我知道有一个相当简单的工作，只要采取消息和/或历史窗格的截图，所以这不是一个关键问题，但可以提供完整性的任何和所有地理处理的结果 2022年11月19日星期六01:19:37 GMT //www.gamepadva.com/t5/community-ideas/simple-geoprocessing-log-reports/idi-p/1233495 JamesArmstrong_ 2022 - 11 - 19 - t01:19:37z //www.gamepadva.com/t5/community-ideas/new-forum-30daymapchallenge/idi-p/1229250 我看到了2022年GIS日论坛，我的第一个想法是“我们在这里有论坛 ?”< / P >

I think it's nice to have topical, informal spaces for sharing and maybe a bit of showing off, too. I know it's already the 7th, but it's not too late to get folks in on the #30DayMapChallenge happening elsewhere across social media!

https://30daymapchallenge.com/

Or maybe if it's not for this particular event, just having a "share your cool maps" space that users could post to would be a neat way to build community outside of the typical "informal tech support" that this space is known for.

它适用于正常的线程帖子:

此外，现在我可以直接比较它们:通常使想法的帖子标题类似于正常帖子。

• 用户名空格
• 上边框下方更多空格
• 日期字体颜色

看起来只有两周的通知存储在社区通知提要页面:

据我所知，旧的通知会自动删除。

如果能存储更多的通知将会很有帮助。例如，我已经离开办公室两个多星期了。所以超过两周的通知都丢失了。< / P >

I'm aware that some of the notifications might have been sent to me via email. That helps in some cases, but is not a complete picture.

如果你能在搜索栏中添加一个选择器来搜索“我的订阅&通知”(→“我的订阅”和“书签”)!< / P >

I have 130+ Subscriptions and Bookmarks and is hard to find a specific item at them moment when I look for it.

通知提要页面应该显示帖子的完整标题，而不是截断它:

否则，我们需要费力地打开每个帖子来查看它们是关于什么的，这在一定程度上破坏了提要的目的。如果我能看到完整的标题，那么我就会知道它是否与我相关。< / P >

As a workaround, I checked if there was a tooltip with the full title, but there isn't a tooltip.

如果我在一个帖子中使用了系统不喜欢的内容，例如从Stack Overflow中粘贴内容:

Hello world!

 …然后当我点击提交时，系统不会马上提交，而是会给我一个警告信息，问我是否要继续自动修改的内容。

在过去，我已经失去了帖子/评论，因为那个怪癖。我没有注意，没有意识到帖子没有提交，所以我离开了页面，以为一切都很好。与此同时，有一个我不认为需要处理的信息。< / P >

• Often that message is in plain sight -- a big red box -- so that's good. But I think there are cases where it's not in plain sight. Maybe for comments...the page scrolls away from the warning. I can't remember exactly, but I think it does happen.

When I do notice that message, I always just hit proceed anyway, without thinking twice. So to me, that step doesn't really have value. Regardless, whatever HTML changes have been made...aren't visible in the result...you can't see/notice what changed. So it's not a very useful step.

Idea: Could the "do you want to proceed" step just be eliminated? 

That would be a lot more convenient and avoid me accidently not submitting posts.

I know there are a few indirect ways to get to a search page like that. But I think it involves navigating away from my profile page. To me, it would make more sense to have a search bar right in my profile.

Thoughts?

如果有回复，ArcGIS社区会发送提醒邮件，但没有解决方案被接受:

< img src = " //www.gamepadva.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/41417i962400665183426F/image-size/medium?v=v2& px = 400”角色=”按钮“title =“bud_0 - 1652708554834. png”alt = " bud_0 - 1652708554834. png " / > < / span > < / P > < P > (< A href = " //www.gamepadva.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/arcgis-pro-crashes-when-copying-oracle-view-to/td-p/1172078 " target = " _self”> ArcGIS Pro崩溃时复制甲骨文视图FGDB < / >) < / P > < P >这样的消息是有道理的,如果从别人回答。但如果唯一的回复来自我，那么我不需要提醒。< / P >

The reason I might reply to my own post is: The original post is already quite long...too long to include additional technical details. So I add the details as a separate comment instead.
I know that's not the only scenario where people reply to their own posts (people might answer their own questions). But I think it's a common enough scenario that it should be accounted for.

Could Esri consider changing how those notifications work — so that they're only sent if someone other than the OP replied to the post?

• If there aren’t any upvotes, it was created recently, and the status is open, then it should be safe to delete the idea. It’s not like the idea is an established post from years ago…with lots of valuable comments, etc…
• Example: Convert M-enabled ST_GEOMETRY to WKT — using proper OGC syntax

Is there a reason why users can’t delete their own post in that scenario? (Similar to what we can do with forum posts.)

• 我们可以格式化预格式化文本，不像代码块。
• 代码块使用笨拙(额外的换行，尝试编辑时笨拙的单击)。

话虽如此，预格式化文本存在问题。当我从IDE(如SQL Developer)复制代码时，缩进被剥离:

—//www.gamepadva.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/pl-sql-code-review-set-polyline-m-values-to/td-p/1159398
与
函数毕达哥拉斯(x1在数字，y1在数字，x2在数字，y2在数字)返回数字
开始
返回圆(根号((x2 - x1) * (x2 - x1) + (y2 - y1) * (y2 - y1))， 2);——Power is a slow function
end;

function m_as_length(shape in sde.st_geometry) return varchar2
is
result varchar2(32767);
vertex_set varchar2(32767);
oldX number;
oldY number;
newX number;
newY number;
line_len number:= 0;
begin 
 for vPartIndex in 1..sde.st_geometry_operator .st_numgeometries_f(shape)
loop
vertex_set:= null;
for vPointIndex in1..sde.st_geometry_operators.st_numpoints_f(sde.st_geometry_operators. st_geometry_operators (shape,vPartIndex))
newX:= sde.st_geometry_operators.st_pointn_f(sde.st_geometry_operators.st_pointn_f(shape,vPartIndex)，vPointIndex);
if vPointIndex <>1 then
line_len:= line_len + pythagoras(oldX, oldY, newX, newY);
end if;
oldX:= newX;
vertex_set:= vertex_set || newX || ' ' | b| newY || ' ' || line_len || '， ';
end loop;
result:= result || '(' || rtrim((vertex_set)，'，
结束循环;
返回'MULTILINESTRING M (' || rtrim((result)，'，') || ')';
select
m_as_length(shape) 
from
polyline

(这发生了，即使缩进是文字空格 在SQL Developer，


这不是我们想要的。举个例子,如果我是复制我的代码(比如堆栈溢出)的其他地方,然后粘贴从S.O.预格式化的文本,然后缩进将保存:< / P > < >之前——//www.gamepadva.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/pl-sql-code-review-set-polyline-m-values-to/td-p/1159398函数毕达哥拉斯(人数数量x1, y1, x2的数量,数量y2)返回数字开始返回圆(I - ((x2 - x1) * (x2 - x1) + (y2 - y1) * (y2 - y1)), 2);——权力是一个缓慢的功能端;函数m_as_length(形状在sde.st_geometry)返回varchar2结果varchar2(32767); vertex_set varchar2(32767); oldX number; oldY number; newX number; newY number; line_len number := 0; begin for vPartIndex in 1..sde.st_geometry_operators.st_numgeometries_f(shape) loop vertex_set := null; for vPointIndex in 1..sde.st_geometry_operators.st_numpoints_f(sde.st_geometry_operators.ST_GeometryN_f(shape,vPartIndex)) loop newX := sde.st_geometry_operators.st_x_f(sde.st_geometry_operators.st_pointn_f(sde.st_geometry_operators.st_geometryn_f(shape,vPartIndex),vPointIndex)); newY := sde.st_geometry_operators.st_y_f(sde.st_geometry_operators.st_pointn_f(sde.st_geometry_operators.st_geometryn_f(shape,vPartIndex),vPointIndex)); if vPointIndex <> 1 then line_len := line_len + pythagoras(oldX, oldY, newX, newY); end if; oldX := newX; oldY := newY; vertex_set := vertex_set || newX || ' ' || newY || ' ' || line_len || ', '; end loop; result := result || '(' || rtrim((vertex_set),', ') || '),'; end loop; return 'MULTILINESTRING M (' || rtrim((result),',') || ')'; end; select m_as_length(shape) from polyline

So, we can see that the preformatted text is capable of handling pasted indents, in some cases.

Idea:

Could preformatted text be enhanced so that pasted indents are always preserved?
(even when pasting from IDEs like SQL Developer)

It’s possible do that with other vendor’s ideas portals. It’s really handy (see the filters on the left):

Could Esri consider doing something similar?

在ArcGIS社区帖子…w当使用适当的代码块时:

问题:
编辑后，将自动添加前后 代码块

这些多余的空格不需要。

然而我们没有这个问题与预格式化的文本:

控制台(“Hello World”)

我们可以编辑后-额外的空间不会被添加在 预格式化文本(这是好的)。

想法:
代码块是否可以改进，以便编辑帖子不会在代码块周围创建额外的空间?

谢谢。

  星期一，2022年3月21日16:09:44格林尼治时间 //www.gamepadva.com/t5/community-ideas/code-blocks-after-editing-the-post-line-breaks-get/idi-p/1155777 芽 2022 - 03 - 21 - t16:09:44z //www.gamepadva.com/t5/community-ideas/add-a-arcade-label-to-the-arcgis-pro-ideas/idi-p/1148829

是否应该将街机标签添加到< a href="//www.gamepadva.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/idb-p/arcgis-pro-ideas" target="_self">ArcGIS Pro Ideas社区?< / P >

Otherwise, there doesn't seem to be a good category to label Arcade ideas with.

Example: Midpoint() Arcade function

当ESRI员工通过将重复的想法转换为注释来合并想法:
如果注释可以表明它是由系统/ESRI插入的-并且以前是一个想法，这将有所帮助。

原因:
由想法转换而来的注释经常显得莫名其妙。据我所知，没有办法证明它们最初是想法。示例: //www.gamepadva.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/calculating-the-x-and-y-coordinate-automatically/idc-p/940925/highlight/true#M15674 那个观点没有任何背景。所以之前发表评论的人很困惑，因为他们已经在之前的评论中解决了这个问题。< / P >

If some background info were added as a auto-generated header, explaining where the comment came from, then that would avoid confusion.

  2022年2月23日星期三17:17:21 GMT //www.gamepadva.com/t5/community-ideas/fix-sorting-amp-filtering-ideas/idi-p/1147073 rburke 2022 - 02年- 23 - t17:17:21z //www.gamepadva.com/t5/community-ideas/support-inline-code-snippets-in-arcgis-community/idi-p/1146808 如果ArcGIS社区帖子能够支持内联代码片段，那将是很有帮助的。< / P >

Example:

While we can change the font of in-line text: for point in part:, it would be better if we could also change the background color to grey, etc.

That would make it a lot easier to read text that has inline code.

Thanks!

ArcGIS这个，ArcGIS那个....你能不能把ArcGIS部分从产品列表中删除，这样我们就可以搜索剩下的…这是

而不是ArcGIS Aviation，如果只是Aviation

和Dashboards, City Engine等等等等等等

等等，这对眼睛来说会更容易